Plans to dispose of low-level nuclear waste from Aukus submarines at Adelaide’s Osborne naval shipyard have sparked unanimous opposition from the Port Adelaide Enfield council.
The council, which oversees the area surrounding the facility, claims it was not consulted regarding the decision, highlighting concerns over transparency and public engagement.
The Osborne shipyard in South Australia and HMAS Stirling in Western Australia have been designated as radioactive waste management sites under the Australian Naval Nuclear Power Safety Bill, passed in October.
While officials have assured that only low-level radioactive waste—such as contaminated gloves and wipes—will be stored temporarily, the lack of community consultation has drawn criticism.
Mayor Claire Boan emphasized the council’s intent to advocate for the local community, despite having limited control over the federal government’s decision.
Rex Patrick, a former senator, called out the Albanese government for its secrecy, pointing out a lack of clarity around plans for managing intermediate and high-level waste, which are notably absent from public announcements.
Low-level radioactive waste, described by nuclear scientist Nigel Marks as “radioactive but not dangerous,” is often managed without extensive public consultation.
However, he acknowledged the need for greater transparency, especially when dealing with higher-risk materials.
Marks pointed to Finland and Sweden as examples of successful community-engaged nuclear waste management practices, urging Australia to adopt a similar approach.
A spokesperson for Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles stated that intermediate and high-level radioactive waste would not be stored at the Osborne or HMAS Stirling sites.
However, with no clear plan for the long-term handling of such materials, public unease persists.
Greater transparency and proactive communication could help address community concerns while fostering trust in the management of Australia’s nuclear waste from the Aukus program.