California Governor Gavin Newsom has recently signed a new law, A.B. 460, that imposes significantly higher fines for illegal water diversions. This legislation allows for fines up to $10,000 per day for individuals caught stealing water from rivers, a stark increase from the previous maximum of $4,000 established two years ago.
This change comes in response to the ongoing challenges posed by climate change, which have exacerbated water scarcity and threatened both natural ecosystems and local wildlife.
The new fines aim to serve as a deterrent against water theft, which has been viewed as a serious issue affecting California’s water resources. Conservation advocates like Analise Rivero of California Trout have welcomed the increase, arguing that the previous fines were too lenient to discourage violations.
Rivero emphasized that the heightened penalties could compel individuals to reconsider their actions, reinforcing the state’s commitment to protecting its limited water supplies during a period of prolonged drought.
A.B. 460 was not without controversy, having undergone several revisions before its passage in the state legislature. A significant point of contention was the original provision allowing California’s water board to issue immediate “interim relief orders” against violators.
This provision faced opposition from agricultural groups concerned about potential violations of due process. Ultimately, its removal led to increased support for the bill from various stakeholders, including the California Farm Bureau, which recognized the amendments as a way to safeguard the rights of water users.
In addition to the heightened fines, the new law introduces a volumetric fine structure, imposing additional charges based on the amount of water illegally diverted.
This approach is intended to address the far-reaching consequences of water theft, which not only impacts ecosystems but also undermines the rights of compliant water users. Rivero pointed out that allowing violators to operate unchecked is unfair to those who follow regulations, highlighting the need for accountability within the water management system.
Despite the advancements made with A.B. 460, California’s water management policies continue to face challenges. Recently, former President Trump threatened to withhold federal funds for wildfire relief unless Governor Newsom modifies regulations that limit water extraction from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, aimed at protecting endangered fish species.
This situation underscores the ongoing debates surrounding California’s water resources and the competing interests at play as the state navigates the implications of climate change and resource scarcity.