Australia’s cattle industry faces mounting scrutiny over environmental practices as new European Union regulations threaten to reshape the global beef trade. The European Union Deforestation Regulation, set to take effect at the end of 2025, will require exporters to prove their products haven’t originated from land deforested since December 2020.
This regulatory shift comes as Australia grapples with its environmental record, where beef production drives significant land clearing, particularly in Queensland, where 2.2 million hectares of forest and bushland were bulldozed in just five years. The debate has intensified ahead of upcoming elections, with farmers, environmentalists, and policymakers wrestling over definitions of sustainable land management and the industry’s environmental responsibilities.
EU Regulations Reshape Global Beef Standards
The European Union Deforestation Regulation represents a fundamental shift in international trade requirements, targeting products linked to forest destruction. Under these new rules, EU companies will be prohibited from importing beef products from properties where deforestation occurred after December 31, 2020. The regulation specifically defines deforestation as the conversion of forest to agricultural use, including land used for livestock rearing.
Australia received favorable treatment when the European Commission classified it as a low-risk country in May 2025, meaning only 1% of importers will face annual checks compared to 9% for high-risk origins. This classification provides Australian exporters with simplified due diligence processes, though they must still provide geolocation data and land use information to EU importers.
The Scale of Australia’s Deforestation Challenge
Environmental data reveals the magnitude of land clearing in Australia, with cattle farming identified as the primary driver. In Queensland alone, 89% of all land cleared was for pasture development, supporting Australia’s position as one of the world’s largest meat exporters. The state experienced approximately 2.1 million hectares of federally mapped threatened species habitat destruction over five years, including over 730,000 hectares of endangered koala habitat.
Despite these concerning figures, Australia has also demonstrated positive trends in forest management. The country recorded the second-highest rate of reforestation globally, with a 4.4 million hectare increase in forest area from 2010 to 2020. Government data shows Australia’s total forest area increased by 750,000 hectares between 2016 and 2021, with the country’s forest coverage described as “extensive and expanding”.
Industry Response and Definitional Disputes

Cattle Australia, representing 52,000 grass-fed cattle producers, has developed its own land management policy in response to international pressure. The organization argues that Australian farmers operate under 136 pieces of vegetation management legislation and defines deforestation narrowly as illegal land-clearing or clearing that exceeds specific height and coverage thresholds.
However, this industry-led definition has faced sharp criticism from environmental groups. The Australian Conservation Foundation described Cattle Australia’s approach as “greenwashing,” arguing it creates loopholes that exempt threatened species habitat from deforestation commitments. WWF-Australia similarly criticized the policy, stating it “does not meet market access requirements for domestic and export markets”.
Market Pressures Drive Change
Consumer awareness and corporate responsibility initiatives are creating additional pressure on the beef industry. Major Australian retailers, including Coles, Woolworths, and Aldi, have announced deforestation-free commitments, responding to growing consumer demand for sustainably sourced products. Over 6,000 companies globally have signed up for the Science Based Targets initiative, requiring the removal of deforestation-linked products from their supply chains.
The financial sector is also applying pressure, with banks increasingly required to report on deforestation links in their operations, creating flow-on effects for agricultural lending. This multi-faceted pressure from consumers, retailers, and financiers is forcing the industry to confront its environmental practices more seriously.
Balancing Production and Conservation
The challenge facing Australia’s beef industry involves balancing productive agriculture with environmental stewardship. While the majority of Australian beef production may already be deforestation-free, the actions of a minority of large-scale land clearers threaten the industry’s reputation and market access. Environmental groups emphasize that addressing this minority could significantly improve the industry’s environmental profile.
The Australian Beef Sustainability Framework has acknowledged both gains and losses in vegetation cover, reporting that while net woody vegetation on cattle grazing land increased by almost 750,000 hectares in 2022, 927,000 hectares of forest were simultaneously lost. The industry recognizes the need to better understand the causes of forest loss, including natural disasters, climatic events, and management practices.
As Australia approaches its election period, the intersection of agricultural productivity, environmental responsibility, and international market access continues to generate significant political and economic debate, with the beef industry’s future practices likely to influence both domestic policy and international trade relationships.